[BLU/Officers] Chimera Linux

[Kurt Keville]

I will look through this. As Bill implied, we may inherit more problems
than solutions from the BSD family tree but it will be interesting to see
if it solves one of the problems considered a deal-breaker in the current
paradigm. If it solves "security" to the satisfaction of most proponents it
may have traction. As they used to say at the Salem Willows Skee-ball
pavilion, "One oh-shit wipes out a thousand atta-boys" and right now we are
well into the oh-shit realm on Linux-adjacent security.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 9:49 PM Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 5:13 PM John Abreau <jabr at blu.org> wrote:
>
>> This looks interesting. Should be a great topic for an upcoming BLU
>> meeting.
>>
>
> Could be!
>
>
>> It's not yet reached alpha, but it's
>>
>
> No rush to schedule i guess if it's not even Alpha stage
>
>> "... its userland tools are based on FreeBSD, LLVM serves as the system
>> toolchain, and musl provides the C library implementation."
>>
>
> Interesting choices. And it's nice to have choices.
> (*I have fond memories of BSD and *BSD, but i'm sufficiently used to
> what's wrong with GNU userland that i don't know that it's worth switching!
> tho i'd use a born-secure *BSD were i building a network facing appliance!!*
> )
>
> _______________________________________________
> Officers mailing list
> Officers at lists.blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/officers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/officers/attachments/20230215/224e077c/attachment.html>