[BLU/Officers] Online meetings

David Kramer david at thekramers.net
Wed Mar 25 09:38:31 EDT 2020


I'll be available

On 3/24/20 5:27 PM, John Abreau wrote:
> Let's do the jitsi test tomorrow evening. Who's available to participate?
>
> Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 7:00 pm.
>
> You can join the meeting directly at the url: https://meet.jit.si/blu.org
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:52 PM John Abreau <abreauj at gmail.com 
> <mailto:abreauj at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I've added Federico to the conversation.
>
>     I did some further testing, and found that desktop sharing and
>     windows sharing seem to work well on both hangouts-meet meet and
>     jitsi.
>
>     I looked into recording the meetings, and I found that jitsi does
>     it out of the box for free, whereas hangouts only provides it for
>     Enterprise accounts, which I assume would be prohibitively
>     expensive for us. Jitsi records the meetings to dropbox, and when
>     I downloaded and played my test recording afterwards, the video
>     and audio quality were excellent.
>
>     I performed both tests from within google chrome, so both are
>     platform-agnostic. Members won't have to install a dedicated
>     client to attend. Unless they attend by a handheld device, of
>     course, but I saw that jitsi has both iOS and Android client apps,
>     and I assume hangout-meet does as well. I tested the jitsi android
>     app, before I tried it in the browser, and it worked well.
>
>     If we find that all else is equal, I'm leaning toward jitsi at
>     this point, but I'd still like to run some tests with other
>     participants using both platforms, initially with just a few of us
>     and later with a larger number of participants.
>
>     Setting up our own jitsi server is an option I'd like to
>     investigate later, but for now we can stick with the existing free
>     server. The roll-your-own server is only actively supported on
>     Ubuntu, and apparently installing it on CentOS is a major hassle,
>     so if we decide to set up our own, I'll want to build the new
>     server with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS instead of CentOS 8, and 20.04 won't
>     be released until next month.
>
>
>     On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:20 PM John Abreau <abreauj at gmail.com
>     <mailto:abreauj at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         I also have a server at home that's meant for our site. I had
>         held off on building it until CentOS 8 was released, then
>         forgot to get back to it, but I'll add that to my todo list
>         and start working on it this week.
>
>         I installed jitsi earlier today, just after replying to Bill.
>         It looks okay in the browser and on my android phone, as far
>         as I can tell without other participants, although in firefox
>         it complained about the browser and recommended google chrome
>         instead. The jitsi client application appears to be a
>         text-based chat client; I've been unable to find any video
>         capabilities in it.
>
>         I lust connected to Hangout Meet with google chrome using my
>         gapps login. Again, like jitsi, I need some other participants
>         in order to try it out properly.
>
>         The video meeting I have open now is at the following link:
>
>         https://meet.google.com/oda-sngs-krp
>
>
>         On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:01 PM Jerry Feldman
>         <gaf.linux at gmail.com <mailto:gaf.linux at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             I agree that G-Hangout-Meet and Jtsi are worth a look. We
>             have 2 issues:
>             1. April 15th. We just have to coordinate with Federico.
>             2. Officers. (a more standard collaboration platform, like
>             G-Hangout-Meet
>             3. I have a server sitting at home that I will bring to
>             the BLU hosting center at some time.
>
>             On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:50 PM Bill Ricker
>             <bill.n1vux at gmail.com <mailto:bill.n1vux at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>                 On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 2:24 PM John Abreau
>                 <abreauj at gmail.com <mailto:abreauj at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>                     If Zoom is unacceptable, then I imagine skype,
>                     hangouts, and the other options mentioned
>                     previously will likely also have issues. It sounds
>                     like you think it would be bad to even test Zoom.
>
>
>                 While Skype and Hangout-Meet are owned by MS and
>                 Alpha/GOOG, respectively somewhat and highly suspect
>                 on privacy grounds, i am not _aware_ of any _specific_
>                 privacy issues with them.
>                 (I haven't noticed targeted ads as a result of
>                 keywords in Hangout... yet ... as i do with G-mail,
>                 G-chat and FB DM and post/reply.
>                 Creepy but better than all the ED cures they used to
>                 offer when my only known demographic was Male.
>                 OTOH you'd think they'd know i eventually bought a
>                 mattress after comparison shopping so maybe i don't
>                 need another immediately and they can back off that
>                 keyword?)
>
>                     I looked through those links, and a couple of them
>                     recommend Jitsi as an alternative. Apparently we
>                     could run our own blu.org <http://blu.org> jitsi
>                     server on our hardware.
>
>
>                 That would seem to be the most FLOSS-dogfood option
>                 based on the current buzz.
>                 I can't personally recommend as I haven't tried Jitsi.
>                 Offhand IDK running our own might be required - is
>                 there a free server and is it over-subscribed in this
>                 crisis?
>
>                     Shall we test jjitsi instead, or do you have some
>                     other platform in mind that we should try? I'd
>                     really like to try out something suitable this
>                     week for holding an officers meeting with at least
>                     3 participants.
>
>
>                 I'm comfortable with G-Hangout-*Meet* and that is
>                 compatible with our existing YouTub archive, bonus.
>                 Jitsi probably worth a look.
>
>                 // Bill
>
>
>
>             -- 
>             --
>             Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com
>             <mailto:gaf.linux at gmail.com>>
>             Boston Linux and Unix
>             PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7
>             Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1  3050 5715 B88D
>             6F6B B6E7
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
>         Email: abreauj at gmail.com <mailto:abreauj at gmail.com> / WWW
>         http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
>         PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C
>         9200 63C6
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
>     Email: abreauj at gmail.com <mailto:abreauj at gmail.com> / WWW
>     http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
>     PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
>
>
>
> -- 
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> Email: abreauj at gmail.com <mailto:abreauj at gmail.com> / WWW 
> http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
> PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Officers mailing list
> Officers at lists.blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/officers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/officers/attachments/20200325/5413452c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Officers mailing list