-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At some point hitherto, Bill Bogstad hath spake thusly:
> The problem is that you and I disagree about the interpretation of the
> following sentence:
> 
> >> The binaries that are certified by the major ISVs and OEMs will not be
> >> made freely available for distribution by anyone.

Agreed. :)

> I interpret 'anyone' to mean 'any entity in the entire world' with the
> implication that anyone who does so is going to run afoul of their
> laywers.

The question is not the "anyone" but "distribution" -- it implies
coming from the original source, as compared to the GPL's usage of the
term "redistribution" which is what one does after obtaining something
that's been distributed.

> sentence and I have no problem with it at all.  You state later that
> somewhere else he says that distributing binaries is okay, but you
> can't call it UnitedLinux (based on trademark issues).  If you can
> provide the reference to that, my issues probably go away (except for

Well, as I said, I don't have the link handy but I posted it here
previously.  So if you do a search in the archives for UnitedLinux, it
should turn up.  Although, it is possible that I posted it not here,
but instead on GNHLUG.  There's a significant overlap in some of the
regular posters, so I sometimes get them confused.  :)

I don't have time now, but if no one's turned it up later, I'll do
some digging.

- -- 
Derek Martin               ddm@pizzashack.org    
- ---------------------------------------------
I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG!
GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu
Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9GLVWdjdlQoHP510RAjnPAKC4P2d/QMBdzBuCzCBKqz93qIpf5QCgiELF
HXZThn7F2bo7fEf9nUgB+6Y=
=dUcd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----